|
What is P's liability if his dog bites someone for the first time? |
Negligence |
|
What is the standard for P's liability if his dog bits someone for the second time? |
Strict liability (because P keeps an animal with known dangerous propensities) |
|
What is the standard for keeping wild animals? |
Strict liability |
|
How do safety precautions play into keeping wild animals? |
They don't - ignore them - because strict liability applies |
|
What is an abnormally dangerous activity? (2 parts) |
Foreseeable risk of serious harm even when reasonable care is exercised, not in common use in community |
|
What is the effect of contributory negligence on an intentional tort? |
None - they can never recover on negligence claim against landowner/possessor |
|
What is the effect of contributory negligence under traditional common law? |
P's negligence completely barred recovery, unless last clear chance applies |
|
What is the last clear chance doctrine? |
P recovers despite contributory negligence; the person with the last clear chance to avoid an accident who fails to do so is liable for negligence |
|
Is last clear chance used in comparative negligence jurisdictions? |
No |
|
What is assumption of risk? |
If P knew of risk and voluntarily proceeded in face of the risk, P may be denied recovery in strict liability |
|
Is a casual seller a merchant? |
No. |
|
Is a service provider a merchant of goods provided that are incidental to the service? |
No |
|
Is a lessor a merchant for purposes of strict liability? |
Yes |
|
Every firm in a product distribution change is… |
A merchant subject to strict liability |
|
Is privity required for strict liability? |
No |
|
What is liability for reasonably foreseeable damages done by a trespass of his animals? |
Strict liability |
|
Is an owner strictly liable for damages by wild animals to trespassers? |
No |
|
How to tell when a product has a design defect? |
Hypothetical alternative design is safer, cost-justified, and practical |
|
How to tell when a product has a manufacturing defect? |
An unusual problem - the one in a million - exploding toaster! |
|
When is a warning necessary? |
If a product has physical risk that can't be remedied by different designs, and consumer would not be aware of them |
|
What is the effect of a product that needs a warning but lacks it? |
It's like a defective design |
|
When will a warning not remove liability? |
When the product can physically be altered to be safer at a low cost |
|
How can P prove a manufacturing defect? |
By showing that the product failed to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect |
|
Must D anticipate reasonable misuse? |
Yes |
|
Compliance with government safety standards is… |
Nonconclusive evidence that product is not defective |
|
Noncompliance with government safety standards is … |
Conclusively establishes that the product is defective |
|
What about strict liability and knives? |
Manufactures will not be held liable for some dangerous products if danger is apparent and there is no safer way to make the product |
|
Can a bystander sue a commercial supplier in the chain of distribution in strict liability? |
Yes - there is no privity requirement |
|
Does comparative negligence reduce recovery in strict liability cases? |
Yes |
|
When is employer liable for employee's intentional tort? |
When job involves danger (repo man), authorized violence (bouncer), or when employee is engaged in a misguided effort to serve boss's purposes |
|
When is hiring party liable for tort of independent contractor? |
When hiring party is land possessor and P is an invitee (duty to invitee is nondelegable) |
|
When is car owner liable for tort of driver? |
When driver is using the car to do an errand for owner |
|
Are parents liable for the torts of their kids? |
No, but parents can be liable in negligence for actions that led to tort (e.g., leaving loaded gun around) |
|
What to watch for in vicarious liability questions? |
D may not be vicariously liable, but D can be liable for underlying tort |
|
When does indemnification apply? |
Vicarious liability (e.g., car owner from driver), products liability (for nonmanufacturer from manufacturers) |
|
What recovery for loss of consortium? |
Services, society, sexual intimacy |
|
May a landowner use a vicious dog to protect only his property? |
No! |
|
When does governmental immunity not apply? |
When government is engaged in an activity that is normally conducted by private industry |
|
Does a city operating a parking lot for profit retain government immunity re activities in the parking lot? |
No, because it's enacting in an activity that's normally conducted by private industry |
|
Just because one party is negligent doesn't mean other potential Ds aren't … |
liable, too (either strictly or in negligence) |
|
Which determines matters of law, judge or jury? |
Judge |
|
Which determines whether an activity is abnormally dangerous? |
Judge, because it is a mater of law |
|
Which decides whether misuse of product is reasonably foreseeable? |
Jury |
|
Which decides whether inadequate warnings make product so defective as to be unreasonably dangerous? |
Jury |





Review All
Quiz!


