|
Personal JDX |
(1) Satisfy a statute (2) Due Process NOTE: |
|
What is in personam jurisdiction |
π wants to impose a personal obligation on ∆ personally, not ∆'s property. (1) Served with process in the state |
|
What is the TEST for the Constitutional analysis for in personam jdx? |
"Does ∆ have such minimum contacts with the forum so that exercise of jdx does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?" TRADITIONAL: CONSTITUTIONAL DP (factors) (2) Fairness (fair play and substantial justice) (a) Realtedness (b) Convenience |
|
What is "purposeful availment?" |
∆ used the state: |
|
How do you remember the Constitutional test for pjdx? |
"My Parents Frequently Forgot to Read Childrens' Stories" (1) Minimum contacts (2) Fair play and substantial justice |
|
What is the difference between general and specific personal jdx? |
(1) General (2) Specific |
|
When can a website subject you to personal jdx? |
If the website is interactive and not passive. |
|
What type of JDX do CA Superior Courts have? |
General Subject Matter JDX. -They can hear any civil case -They cannot hear cases that federal courts have exclusive jdx over (e.g., trademark, bankruptcy, antitrust, etc.) |
|
What is a limited civil case and why is it important? |
-Any case thats AIC ≤$25k |
|
What is the difference between a local and transitory action for purposes of Venue? |
(1) Local Action: (2) Transitory Action: |
|
When can a court transfer venue even though the original venue is proper? |
(1) Cannot have an impartial trial NOTE: |
|
What is "forum non conveniens (inconvenient forum)" |
If there is a FAR more appropriate venue, a court may dismiss (usually without prejudice) (or stay) to allow π to file in that court. This occurs if transfer is impossible because the proper venue is in a different judicial system (another state or foreign). Court may force ∆ to waive PJDX or SOL |
|
Who may serve process? |
Any NON-party who is at least 18. This is the same as federal court |
|
What is the difference between state and federal substitute service of process? |
Federal STATE |
|
Can services be made outside of CA? |
YES. In any manner allowed by CA law. OR By 1st class mail, postage prepaid. |
|
Does CA have immunity from process for those who appear for another case? |
NO. -If ∆ appears for a CIVIL case, ∆ may be served with process for another case. He is not immune. NOTE: |
|
What type of pleadings does CA require? |
Fact pleading. -π must allege the ultimate facts of each element of each COA |
|
What methods of service are allowed in state court? |
(1) Personal (2) Substitute (3) Waiver (4) Publication |
|
What is the difference between federal and state waiver of process? |
STATE FEDERAL |
|
What must the complaint contain? |
(1) A statement of ultimate facts constituting the cause of action (2) Demand for judgment (3) Limited or Unlimited Cases (*) PJDX NOT required |
|
What is a "statement of damages" |
(1) IF π requests damages for a PI, wrongful death, OR request punitive damages |
|
When does ∆ have to respond to π's complaint? |
30 days after service of process |
|
What is the CA counter part to 12(b)(6)? |
The general demurrer. |
|
What else can be raised by general demurrer? |
Lack of SMJDX. -This is rare because state courts have general jdx |
|
What can be raised in a special demurrer? |
(1) Complaint is uncertain, ambiguous, or unintelligible |
|
How can ∆ respond π's complaint? |
(1) General demurrer |
|
When can a π demurrer to a ∆'s answer? |
If the ∆'s answer does not state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute an affirmative defense. |
|
What are the federal counter parts to the CA "cross complaint?" |
(1) Cross complaint against π (2) Cross complaint against co-∆ (3) Cross complaint against impleader 3rd party |
|
Are fictitious ∆'s allowed in state court? |
YES. NOT in federal court |
|
What is the difference between the work product doctrine in CA and Federal Court? |
California: Federal: |
|
Is there discovery of consulting experts (those who will not testify at trial)? |
NO Not in state or federal court. |
|
Can an attorney seek to limit discovery by claiming the information sought is private? |
YES -The CA constitution recognizes a right of privacy |
|
Does an attorney have a duty to supplement discovery responses? |
NOT in CA so long as the information given was accurate and complete when given. In Federal court, YES. |
|
Because there is not duty to supplement discovery responses in CA, how does the opposing party ensure accurate and complete responses? |
He may request Supplemental Discovery up to 2 times before the trial date is set AND 1 time after. -This is ONLY allowed in UNLIMITED cases |
|
What are the types of class actions in state court? |
THERE are NONE. -Unlike federal court |
|
What are the types of dismissal in state court? |
(1) Voluntary (2) Involuntary (3) Mandatory |
|
Right to a Jury Trial |
STATE FEDERAL |
|
When will a state court grant a trial doe to excessive or inadequate damages? |
When the award "shocks the conscience." |
|
Does a court always have to grant a motion for a new trial if the award "shocks the conscience?" |
NO Remittitur (lower) OR Additur (raise) |
|
Is additur allowed in federal court? |
NO -It is unconstitutional, in violation of the 7th amendment. |
|
When are interlocutory reviews allowed (appeal of a non-final judgment)? |
(1) By statute (2) Collateral order rule (3) Extraordinary writ |
|
What law is used for claim and issue preclusion? |
The law of the system that decided the 1st case. E.g., if state law decided case 1, use state law for claim and issue preclusion in case 2 even if it is in federal court. |
|
What are the elements of claim preclusion? |
(1) Same claimant against the same ∆ |
|
When is a judgment "on the merits?" |
ALWAYS UNLESS |
|
For purposes of issue and claim preclusion, how do you determine if the cause of action is the same? |
FEDERAL: CA: |
|
What are the elements of issue preclusion? |
(1) Case 1 ended in a valid, final judgment on the merits (2) Same issue was actually litigated and determined in Case 1 (3) The issue was essential to the judgment of Case 1 (4) Against a party to Case 1 (5) By whom? |
|
Is there risk of issue or claim preclusion after a default judgment? |
Issue Preclusion: NO Claim Preclusion: YES |
|
When is a case classified as limited or unlimited? |
(1) Initially in the complaint by P (2) May be reclassified |
|
If there is a motion to reclassify a case (limited/unlimited), what is the standard? |
(1) Unlimited --> Limited (2) Limited --> Unlimited |
|
In determining if a case is limited or unlimited, will the court aggregate claims? |
YES -Unrelated claims of P against D |
|
Are special demurrers available in limited cases? |
NO, only in unlimited cases. |
|
Can P assert a claim against a fictitious D? |
YES IF: NOTE: |
|
Are demurrers "granted" or "sustained" |
Sustained Motions are granted or denied Demurrers are sustained or overruled |
|
When must a motion to quash service of summons be made? |
Before or with a demurrer or a motion to strike. OR it is waived. |
|
What defense is a motion to quashed service of summons used to raise? |
(1) Lack of pjdx -This is known as a "special appearance" |
|
What are the names of the CA joinder claims? |
(1) Cross complaint |
|
Is it easier to join a 3rd party (3rd party impleader) in CA or Federal Court? |
CA CA allows if same T/O |
|
How many depositions may a party take in a limited case? |
ONLY 1 |
|
What are the 5 CA discovery tools? |
(1) Depositions (2) Interrogatories (3) Request to produce (4) Physical or mental exams (5) Request for admissions |
|
What is the CA standard for discoverable material? |
Anything relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action. -This is slightly broader than federal court |
|
Class Action "Big Picture" |
(1) Ascertainable class (2) Well defined community of interest (3) No "types" (4) Notice may be by publication (5) Claims may be aggregated to meed unlimited requirements |
|
What is the $ limit for small claims cases? |
Individual Entity |
|
When determining whether there was a "valid final judgment on the merits" for issue and claim preclusion, what analysis must be undertaken? |
Make sure the previous court disposed of the action in a proper way. E.g., If the court dismissed the action because of lack of SMJDX, analyse whether it actually lacked SMJDC. |





Review All
Quiz!


